recombinant human fgf21 rhfgf21 (PeproTech)
Structured Review

Recombinant Human Fgf21 Rhfgf21, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human fgf21 rhfgf21/product/PeproTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Compromised macrophages contribute to progression of MASH to hepatocellular carcinoma in FGF21KO mice"
Article Title: Compromised macrophages contribute to progression of MASH to hepatocellular carcinoma in FGF21KO mice
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado9311
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of MASH-HCC histology by H&E and Oil Red O staining and immunohistochemistry detection of GF21 protein distribution in the regions of tumor (white dash circle) tissue and adjacent benign tissue. ( B ) Protein and mRNA levels of FGF21 by Western blotting and qPCR in the tumor and adjacent tissues. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. ( C ) Serum FGF21 protein levels by ELISA in the postresection patients with HCC (no relapse and relapse). ( D ) A cohort of 156 overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 ) patients with HCC from TCGA database were subgrouped into G1–2 patients and G3–4 patients to analyze the survival rate, based on high/low expression of FGF21 . ( E ) Representative images of Hyperion Imaging in paraffin-embedding tissues of patients with HCC. ( F to H ) Cell subpopulations of CD68 + macrophages, CD68 + CD163 + macrophages, and CD68 + CD163 + CD14 + macrophages in tumor and adjacent tissues. ( I ) the ratio of CD68 + CD163 + CD14 + macrophages in CD68 + macrophages in tumor and adjacent tissues. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01.
Techniques Used: Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Imaging
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot of DEGs (log2 fold change >1.5) by RNA-seq analysis in the isolated macrophages between FGF21KO-MASH mice and WT-CD controls. ( B ) Heatmap of the signature genes for monocytes and KCs by RNA-seq analysis between FGF21KO-MASH mice and WT-CD controls. ( C ) Running Enrichment Score of transcripts of genes of KCs/macrophages associated with fatty acid (FA) metabolism. ( D ) Heatmap of enzymes for FA metabolism by qPCR. Protein levels of FASN and CD36 by Western blotting in: ( E ) the WT/FGF21KO mice with WSHFD/CD diets, ( F ) the FGF21KO-MASH mice with rhFGF21 treatment compared to vehicle controls and WT-CD controls, and ( G ) FL83B/FL83B-FGF21KD cells treated with palmitic acid (PA), while 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as treatment control. ( H ) Protein levels of HSL and phosphorylated HSL at S563 and S660 by Western blotting in the WT/FGF21KO mice with WSHFD/CD diets. ( I ) Heatmap of long-chain FAs (LCFAs) detected by Waters ACQUITY UPLC Systems coupled with Waters Xevo TQ-S micro triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the WT/FGF21KO mice with WSHFD/CD diets. 21KO, FGF21KO. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Isolation, Western Blot, Control, Targeted Proteomics, Mass Spectrometry
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Protein levels of Alox15 by Western blotting in the liver tissues of WT/FGF21KO mice with WSHFD/CD diets. ( B ) Alox15 mRNA levels by qPCR analysis in the isolated hepatocytes and KCs and the protein levels of Alox15 by Western blotting in KCs from the WT/FGF21KO mice with WSHFD/CD diets. ( C ) Immunofluorescent staining using the antibodies of anti-ALOX15 and anti-F4/80 to detect the positive ALOX15 macrophages. Green, ALOX15-positive staining cells; red, F4/80-positive staining cells; blue, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining to detect the nuclei as a counterstain. ( D ) Protein levels of FAS and cleaved caspase-3 by Western blotting in the isolated mouse KCs challenged with 13-HODE and treated with N -acetyl- l -cysteine (NAC). ( E ) Protein levels of FAS and cleaved caspase-3 by Western blotting in the liver tissues from FGF21KO-MASH mice with rhFGF21 treatment compared to vehicle controls or WT-CD controls. ( F ) Histology-based NAFLD active score (NAS) in the WT/ALOX15KO mice with HFMCD/WSHFD diets. ( G ) CyTOF analysis in the isolated macrophages from mice to detect the KCs defined as F4/80 hi Tim4 + CX3CR1 − cells and the MoMFs defined as CD11b + Tim4 − CX3CR1 + cells in KC pool. The FGF21KO-MASH mice were treated daily with PD146176 or rhFGF21 for 4 weeks. ( H ) Analysis of the RNA-seq data for the mRNA fold changes of immune response signaling pathway and cytokine-cytokine interaction signaling. 21KO, FGF21KO. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Isolation, Staining, RNA Sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic diagram for establishing MASH-HCC models and the gross anatomy of tumor mass in four MASH-HCC models with CD, HFMCD, WSHFD, and HFD, respectively. ( B ) Maximal diameter of tumor nodules and number of tumor nodules in four MASH-HCC models. ( C ) Histology-based NAS in the MASH-HCC mice with HFMCD and WSHFD diets. ( D ) Schematic diagram for rhFGF21 treatment in the MASH-HCC mice with HFMCD and WSHFD diets. ( E ) CyTOF analysis of the KCs (F4/80 hi Tim4 + CX3CR1 − cells) and MoMFs (CD11b + Tim4 − CX3CR1 + cells) from the MASH mice and MASH-HCC mice, as well as the control mice. ( F ) LCFAs in the FGF21KO-MASH-HCC mice compared to normal WT controls. ( G ) Protein levels of cPLA2, Alox15, and MAGL by Western blotting in the liver tissues of FGF21KO-MASH-HCC mice compared to normal WT controls. ( H ) The serum FFA levels in FGF21KO-HCC mice in comparison with the WT-HCC mice, with three diets (CD, HFMCD, and WSHFD). ( I ) S1P levels in serum and liver tissue from FGF21KO-HCC mice in comparison with the WT-HCC mice, with three diets (CD, HFMCD, and WSHFD). 21KO, FGF21KO. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Control, Western Blot, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic diagram of S1P biosynthetic cascade enzymes with the fold changes (FGF21KO-preHCC versus WT-preHCC mice). ND, no detection; NC, no change; red, >2-fold up-regulated; blue, <2-fold down-regulated. ( B ) The S1P levels and protein levels of phosphorylated SPHK1 in liver issues from WT/FGF21KO-preHCC mice compared to that from WT/FGF21KO mice. ( C ) The protein levels of phosphorylated YAP and YAP in WT/FGF21KO-preHCC mice. ( D ) S1P content in FL83B/FL83B-FGF21KD cells and Hepal-6/Hepal-6-FGF21KD cells challenged with PA and treated with rhFGF21. ( E ) The protein levels of phosphorylated SPHK1 in FL83B/FL83B-FGF21KD cells and Hepal-6/Hepal-6-FGF21KD cells challenged with PA and treated with rhFGF21. ( F ) The protein levels of phosphorylated YAP in Hepal-6/Hepal-6-FGF21KD cells challenged with PA or PA + S1P and treated with SKI-II, an inhibitor of SPHK1. ( G ) The protein levels of phosphorylated YAP in Hepal-6/Hepal-6-FGF21KD cells challenged with S1P and treated with inhibitors of S1P receptors (JTE013 for S1PR2 and W146 for S1PR1). ( H ) Colony-forming assay to detect the number of cell colonies in Hepal-6 cells challenged with S1P and treated with JTE013 or verteporfin, an inhibitor of YAP. ( I ) Schematic diagram for JTE013 treatment in the MASH-HCC mice with WSHFD diets. ( J ) The protein levels of phosphorylated YAP in MASH-HCC mice with JTE013 treatment compared to vehicle controls. 21KO, FGF21KO. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Techniques Used:


